Worthwhile perhaps, but not quite incredible.
What makes “The Incredibles” such a fantastic film is its
masterful usage of trappings of the superhero genre to tell a mature story of
adapting to an ever changing society, using the dynamics of the Parr family to
seamlessly blend three complementary narratives into a single tale.
Mr. Incredible’s struggle through a midlife crisis and the
gradual realization that the end of his glory days as a hero doesn’t mean he
doesn’t have an important purpose to serve was perfectly complimented by the
tales of Dash and Violet struggling to hide in plain sight at a time that they
should be exploring who they want to be, while Elastigirl fights to be an
anchor for a family being torn apart by a changing world becoming less tolerant
of the antics of superhumans carries grander implications of world building and
deconstruction that have become the cornerstone of the modern superhero
storytelling landscape almost 4 years before the first proper superhero
cinematic universe of the modern age made its debut.
The movie is lean, elegant, and has something new to uncover
almost every time you watch it, which is why I found myself rather disappointed
that “The Incredibles 2” manages to compose itself of two interweaved
narratives that are quite good only to turn out just a cut above mediocre.
Set minutes after the end of “The Incredibles” as the Parr
family leaps into action against the Underminer, “The Incredibles 2” may have
seen release over 13 years after the original film but its dedication to
maximizing that film’s aesthetic and conceptual marketability at the expense of
its groundbreaking narrative novelty make it feel like the sort of creatively
shortchanged franchise fodder that would have been fast tracked into production
to capitalize on the original’s success within a span of 2 or 3 years.
The titular super family’s work in stopping Syndrome along
with the opening conflict against the Underminer has led to a resurging
interest in public work for superheroes and PR firm chooses Elastigirl to serve
as a spokesperson, rescuing people and doing community service to rally
politicians to repeal the ban on superhero activity.
To grant her the time necessary to accomplish making the
world a better place for their family while also allowing his wife due time in
the spotlight, Mr. Incredible opts to serve as a stay at home father, finally
serving as the family man that his children need and learning to adjust to the
developing powers of infant son Jack-Jack.
Watching Mr. Incredible struggle but ultimately conform to
the role of father that he strives to be with relative competence is genuinely
touching to watch and the potentially dangerous manifestation of Jack-Jack’s
unstable abilities as a metaphor for caring for children with special needs carries
untapped potential that the genre hasn’t fully explored before.
Meanwhile, Elastigirl adapting to operate in the public
again right as a new supervillain arises is action packed, atmospheric, and
every bit as spectacular as anything that you’d find in a mainstream live action
superhero movie.
Where “The Incredibles 2” unfortunately fails to meet its
potential is in the underlying narrative tying its story threads together.
Even by Hollywood standards, the villain reveal and plot is
painfully predictable. The misfortune of failing to meaningfully tie together
the dramatic and genre threads would already have been damaging but the safe
direction that it guides the very setting and characters themselves down
greatly diminishes the bite of the legacy from which the movie was born from to
begin with.
The elements of deconstruction that made the first film so
powerful and enduring are gone, replaced by a trend of reconstruction that fails
to properly address the concerns that brought the characters and their world to
their point in an age where mainstream superhero movies based around triple A
icons are doing this very things as though it were a natural course of action
in an age far after “The Incredibles” did it ahead of time which no doubt
inspired them.
Even going beyond one to one genre comparisons, other Disney
faire such as “Zootopia” still dedicated to illustrating that the sociological
impact of major incidents doesn’t disappear overnight, while “Big Hero 6”
builds a personal arc around deeply emotionally complex issues.
“The Incredibles 2” is not a bad movie by any stretch of the
imagination; its beautifully animated, well voiced, moves at a solid clip, and
for all intents and purposes, entertains. The kids will love it and the adults
will probably be amused overall. However, though it may be admittedly unfair to
hold a film against its pedigree, the only reason to bust out a sequel to a
nearly 14 year old children’s movie is for a cash grab or to have something
genuine to say in contribution to its legacy.
“The Incredibles 2” doesn’t contain even half of the
boldness and ambition of the original and when it bills itself as an organic continuation
of that film that doesn’t even come close to matching its sensibilities, that’s
legitimately damaging, no matter how passable the final product may be.
A Mildly Above Average 6 out of 10
No comments:
Post a Comment