Friday, June 19, 2015

Fromage Fridays #30: Monsters: Dark Continent


This week’s disappointment still hurts less than the previous week’s hollowness.



It occurs to me that in my thrashing of “Kite,” in choosing to abandon Fromage standards, I may have not only allowed the film victory over me but lost the proper opportunity to truly nail home how excruciatingly incompetent and unbearably boring it was. The only thing sparing it from scoring under a 0 rating was… um?

One moment.

1 Nega Shat


Expect that to be reedited into the actual review in the near future.

Anyway, the biggest sin a b-movie can commit is taking your time away while offering absolutely nothing in return. Anger can still be an invigorating emotion but boredom is just downright agonizing to experience for an extended length.

Case and point, “Monsters: Dark Continent;” a masterpiece by comparison sheerly for leaving me with a feeling of crushing disappointment rather than frustrated emptiness.

“Dark Continent” is a sequel to Gareth Edwards micro budget masterpiece about human relationships and our perception of “The Other” against the backdrop of an alien occupation, that one the hearts of critics and the film industry at large, leading to him being selected to helm 2014’s successful effort to raise “Godzilla” from the dead. His involvement with “Godzilla” also resulted in his involvement with this film to be reduced to that of a mere executive producer, which fittingly chops out all of the metaphor and cerebral ideas, leaving a mess of disgusting military movie clichés that skate dangerously close to being the worst possible sequel to “Starship Troopers” never made.

“Monsters: Dark Continent” follows a group of young men from Detroit who have enlisted in the Army. While they seem to enlist aiming to protect their planet from its extraterrestrial occupants, they’ll soon discover that perhaps the true “monsters,” are mankind.

There’s almost an unspoken rule that if your message is dangerously cliché, you need to be able to present it in as nuanced and subtle a way as possible. This is the fundamental failing of “Dark Continent.”

While the first film demonstrated spades of subtlety in its acting and camera work, this film strikes with the blunt force of an SUV crashing into a wall at 50 Miles per hour. The metaphor of the titular “Monsters” is completely lost amongst a sea of military clichés that ultimately formulate a story more focused on the conflict in the Middle East than the presence of the alien beings.

One would think that this would be a terrific opportunity to use the creatures as a means of comparing and contrasting both sides of the conflict as a means of demonstrating how civil or “inhuman” either side of humanity can be when juxtaposed to the seemingly pure aliens. While all of the content is definitely there and I’d be more than willing to bet that may have been the intent, director Tom Green doesn’t quite manage to balance the alien presence against the backdrop of the war or human society.

Where “Monsters” built up a certain mystique around its unseen creatures with the intent of contrasting their ultimate appearance with the built up perception of them across the duration of the film, “Dark Continent,” with its significantly higher budget, lacks the same sort of subtlety. The creatures are fully displayed and detailed, with no shroud of shadows or lighting to mystify their existence and are always portrayed as victims to the loud, obnoxious, unlikable, and borderline jingoistic American military.

As a science fiction film, it fails due to their presence exacerbating the unlikability of the main cast, whose involvement in the plot somehow still boils down to fighting Middle Eastern “insurgents.” As a war film, the ultimate track that the plot goes down is so irritatingly cynical that you can’t even invest in the cast’s plight emotionally.

About the only nice thing that I can say about “Monsters: Dark Continent” is that its cast does do a decent job making the best of the material that they are given and the money that goes into the creature effects certainly shows. Yet, when its predecessor manages to make a genuine observation on the human condition with far less special effect razzle dazzle, I’m left to question just how much worth those strengths really have.

1 Shatner



Bottom Line: "Monsters: Dark Continent" is competently made and passably "B." Unfortunately, all of this amounts to it being mediocre at best.  

No comments:

Post a Comment