Peculiar in name only.
Fall is among us, which once meant a slew of new young adult fantasy flicks duking it out to be the next “Harry Potter” before getting relegated to the Winter-Spring dumping ground until, if the current status of the “Divergent” series is to be believed, finally dying out.
“Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children” picks
the trend up with an admittedly fresher premise that unfortunately falls to the
same traps that even the best of its peers succumb to on their debut outings.
Asa Butterfield plays Jacob Portman, a teenager with
ambitions of exploring the world coming to terms with the death of his
grandfather and the revelation that said grandfather’s tall tales of children
with extraordinary abilities hiding from the world in a home isolated from time
as we know it may not have been the bedtime fiction that he rationalized it as
after growing up. After discovering the titular mistresses home for beings born
with unnatural gifts, Jacob must uncover the enigmatic past that returned to
claim his grandfather’s life in order to protect the children from threats both
outside and within their world.
Directed by Tim Burton, who has had a hit or miss
streak trending more towards misses for the better half of the about a decade, “Miss
Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children” has been touted as a potential return
to form for the director whose sardonic sense of humor and postmodern gothic
infused visual style took film by storm nearly 30 years ago, and it’s not
difficult to see why.
The style of ‘wide-eyed out cast teaming up with a
group of misunderstood misfits to do what nobody else can’ storyline is exactly
the type of thing that is up his ally and the moments in which he is allowed to
indulge in such is where the film is most lively.
Jacob’s search for the home while operating around a
parent too caring to be abusive but too negligent to be effective, while
forming unique relationships with the children themselves are about the best
that the film has to offer. What unfortunately ensues thereafter however is the
unraveling of a production that doesn’t have much going on under the surface of
its own quirks.
Burton’s propensity for humor and character
highlights at the expense of story structure drags down an already problematic
screenplay, which makes each act feel distinctly disconnected from one another.
This wouldn’t be a bad thing if each element really managed to stick out on its
own but there just isn’t quite enough pop to these characters and their world
to make them memorable as depicted here. I certainly felt for Jacob but by the
end of the film his journey felt like a dime a dozen hero’s journey that doesn’t
even particularly stress the impact that he has on the danger.
All of the kids are aesthetically unique and well
conceived but so underdeveloped that you may occasionally forget how many of
them there are supposed to be. Meanwhile, the only truly noteworthy performance
is by Sam Jackson who looks like he is having way too much fun chewing up the
scenery for a role that would have been otherwise forgettable.
Every now and then, the abilities of the children
get put to good use in a fun action set piece but “Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar
Children” can’t overcome the technical flaws of its director or the problematic
handling of its own material.
Where the movie falls flat in trying to be
different, it unfortunately conforms to formulaic aspects of teen book film
adaptations that have become rife for parody nowadays but the type of fantasy
that it espouses is just too difficult to capture well on film to full effect.
“Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children” is
highly reminiscent of the earlier “Harry Potter” films in that the plethora of
characters introduced that drive the narrative and require substantial
investment are put on the backburner in order to properly layout the
fantastical mechanics of the world that they inhabit, merely so the audience can
understand the roughly 2 hour feature they will be sitting through. Even if the
film had handled this well, taking such a hit to emphasizing the characters
would have been an undeniable issue.
Sadly, the large and struggling cast combines with a
clumsy handling of the movie’s fictional mechanics in relation to the story
that it’s trying to tell, leading to a conceptually confusing third act that
serves as a shining example to why these types of books are not only far better
suited to the decompressed territory of television but have been moving more
toward that format for the last few years.
Walking out of my theater and glancing over to a young girl gushing about what
she just saw with a wide eyed sense of wonder that very well may have been on
my face when I left “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone” 15 years ago, a
part of me wants to be easy on “Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children.”
It’s not without its charms and the hefty problems of this film could have very
easily saved a sequel from dealing with such issues in a few years.
Similarly to the aforementioned “Harry Potter” films
however, there’s really no way around how problematic this film is regardless
of what may or may not be over the horizon. It may even be worse given the 15
years of experience the industry should have with handling these things now.
5 Nonexistent X-Men references out of 10
No comments:
Post a Comment