In the theaters and in your living room, it’s a YA
invasion.
January is in full effect and “The 5th
Wave,” starring Chloe Moretz, makes its attempt to take the newly vacated
throne of Young Adult cinematic influence left by the recently wrapped up “Hunger
Games.”
But why spend $10 at the theater fighting crowds for
a derivative experience of children getting killed in stupid and ludicrous
scenarios when you can spend less than $4 for a derivative experience of
children getting killed in stupid and ludicrous scenarios on your own couch. At
least you’d be getting your money’s worth.
“Battle for Skyark” features all the elements that the
teenie boppers of today love in their sci-fi action features; the outcast of
society (here called “Rags”) with some sort of special feature (the son of a military
traitor) becoming the savior of children left to fend for themselves without
adult supervision against “monsters.”
Not that it needed the formula, because the only
thing that you’ll actually remember about this bore is that its embarrassingly
laughable acting isn’t enough to distract from how lifeless the production
feels.
“Battle for Skyark” is an hour and a half long but
is so terribly acted, so cheap, and so boring that it feels like it should have
been over a half hour shorter.
Across every second of the amateurish storytelling
that kicks in the second the opening credits roll, beginning with an exposition
dump about Skyark being some sort of flying paradise built to escape “monsters”
on earth and transitioning to Rags running to cover in medias res with the
other kids and immediately being flirted with by the designated love interest,
never spending more than 25 seconds with the characters that the spare no time
killing off, I couldn’t help but shake the feeling that this movie was made by
somebody in the same age bracket as this flick’s cast and target demographic.
There’s nothing wrong with simplicity in story or
escapism in the name of fun but the bare bones writing of the game comes off as
a 13 year old’s first attempt at fiction, with no concept of character driven
plot or showing instead of telling to be seen.
All in all, a dull and worthless watch that isn’t necessarily
painful but I came across a rather unnerving revelation the more I mulled it
over in regards to the nature of YA stories in general.
For all of the problems of “Battle for Skyark’s”
formulas at play, I really got to thinking what makes this so much worse than
dry dreck like “Divergent” or “The Maze Runner.” The conclusion I reached was
not a pleasant one; money.
Despite featuring mildly superior writing, I can’t
in good conscience call the storytelling of those films much better than
anything seen here. What I can observe however, is that those films have tens
of millions of dollars to sink into set design, CGI effects, and good actors to
polish the weak material that they’re working with.
“Battle for Skyark” lacks the money to cover up just
how bad it is and in doing so, sheds some light on the troubling present of the
film’s it’s attempting to rip off. About the only thing I can commend it for is
honesty.
½ Shatner out of 4
Bottom Line: "Battle for Skyark" has the misfortune of embarrasing not only itself, but its entire genre.
No comments:
Post a Comment